Alberta is home to a vibrant array of communities, each with its own identity and set of unique features. Cities, towns, villages, hamlets, and other municipalities function as local government responsible for delivering services, safety, and infrastructure to inhabitants.

In 2018, changes to the Ombudsman Act expanded our office’s jurisdiction to include the authority to investigate any administrative decision, recommendation, act, or omission of a municipality. Since then, the primary task of the Alberta Ombudsman has been to instill confidence in Albertans that involving the Ombudsman is a fair and effective way to resolve municipal complaints.  

The Alberta Ombudsman acts as an impartial third-party reviewer. Most complaints can be resolved at a low level but where necessary, the Ombudsman will investigate to determine whether a municipality has acted fairly and reasonably.

If a citizen feels they were treated unfairly when accessing a municipal program or servicethey are welcome to call our office. When a call comes in, an investigator will speak with the complainant and make every effort to understand the complainant’s position. We may inquire as to what steps the citizen has taken to resolve the issue and provide information if further review or appeal is available to them. The investigator may contact the municipality to ask questions or to attempt to resolve the situation as a means of early resolution. This interaction also allows the Ombudsman’s staff to build relationships with municipal staff, describe the office’s role and if appropriate, facilitate direct communication between the complainant and the municipality. This often facilitates a timely resolution of the complainant’s problem.

In January 2021, our office surveyed over 100 municipalities to learn what information the Ombudsman can provide to address their areas of interest and how to best deliver this information. Significant interest was expressed in learning more about our role and the concepts of administrative fairness. In response, work is underway to develop a library of educational resources for anyone seeking more information about administrative fairness, the Ombudsman’s role, and relationship to municipalities. Two examples can be found pictured on this page. In addition to the information available on this website, we can provide webinars and workshops to council members, administrators, and other municipal staff upon request.

For more on the Ombudsman work with this important sector, see Building Relationships with Albertans – Municipality Report, a series of cases describing the types of issues from our first two years working with municipalities and the benefits to Albertans of a collaborative approach to resolving complaints.  

For information on developing vaccination passports or certification policies, see Fairness Principles for Public Service Providers Regarding the Use of COVID-19 Vaccine Certification. This guidance document, developed by the Canadian Council of Parliamentary Ombudsman, offers administrators insight into fairness principles to ensure no oppressive or unreasonable barriers exist to accessing local government services. 

Related Case Studies

FAIRNESS THROUGH COLLABORATION

WHAT HAPPENED? This story involves separate complaints from inmates at the Edmonton Remand Centre (ERC). In one, Peter Q. said that ERC staff threw out some important documents during a routine search. In the other, Nick P. complained that personal and canteen items went missing when he was transferred to a new unit.  WHAT DID THE OMBUDSMAN’S OFFICE DO? The Ombudsman…

A NOSE FOR FAIRNESS

WHAT HAPPENED? Juanita K. was one of several residents who wrote to us about an agricultural feedlot in a rural Alberta county. She complained that the feedlot produced a strong, unpleasant odour as well as light pollution, which made living nearby challenging for Juanita and her family. WHAT DID THE OMBUDSMAN’S OFFICE DO? Our office…

FAIRNESS FLOWS

WHAT HAPPENED? One of Alberta’s largest cities asked Brayden W. to keep his water running while they worked on a water line near his property. While the City did not specify how long the work was expected to take, they assured Brayden that he would be reimbursed for the additional expenses incurred by the increased water usage. …

FENCED IN BY A CONFUSING BYLAW

WHAT HAPPENED? It all started with a broken fence, a frustrated neighbour, and a confusing bylaw. An individual contacted the Ombudsman’s office with concerns regarding her neighbour’s fence. She included pictures and the fence mirrored that of a hockey player’s smile—there were more missing planks than those still standing. It was clear the fence was…

EARLY RESOLUTION CASE PROMPTS MAKEOVER OF CITY BYLAW

WHAT HAPPENED? An Albertan complained that a large municipality overcharged him when he applied for a permit to complete renovations on his basement suite. The City advised that it charged the penalty because the complainant did the work without first obtaining the necessary permits and approvals. WHAT DID THE OMBUDSMAN’S OFFICE DO? Our investigator determined…

UNREASONABLE FEE NO LONGER A BARRIER TO A FAIR APPEAL

WHAT HAPPENED? An Alberta resident raised concerns when a summer village approved a development permit for their neighbour’s property. As an affected party, the resident submitted an appeal to the Subdivision and Development Appeal Board (SDAB). The individual learned that because of a recent bylaw change, the fee to submit the appeal had increased to…

MUNICIPALITY RESTRICTS COMMUNICATION IN A FAIR WAY

WHAT HAPPENED? An individual complained to the Ombudsman about a trespass order he received from a small rural municipality after he lost his temper and yelled at a Council meeting. In response, Council discussed the matter privately. It then issued a trespass order, banning the individual from physically attending Council meetings for 60 days. WHAT…

Closing the gap on a code of conduct complaint

This article first appeared in a collaborative series produced by the Alberta Municipalities, Rural Municipalities of Alberta and the Ombudsman’s office. To read the full four-part series, start here. The Ombudsman looked deeper into a code of conduct complaint against several elected officials and recommended a municipal council provide a written decision to the complainant, including…

Annexation mix-up prompts clearer communication

  This article first appeared in a collaborative series produced by the Alberta Municipalities, Rural Municipalities of Alberta and the Ombudsman’s office. To read the full four-part series, start here. A senior couple affected by an annexation agreement between municipalities wanted to continue to live in their home which over the years had been modified…

Notification only goes so far

When a municipality dismisses a resident’s complaint about a councillor, it can expect the resident will express a legitimate interest in understanding the reasons. Maria Levine1 is a resident of a midsized town in rural Alberta. Ms. Levine wrote to the Ombudsman because she believed the town’s process for investigating her complaint about the professional…