About Us
contact Privacy Policy site map Search Site



Printer Friendly Version Essentially, people are entitled to a full and fair opportunity to present their case to the decision-maker. The following examples illustrate how a full and fair opportunity to be heard can be denied:
  • One woman was attempting to appeal the amount of her social assistance overpayment. Each time she wrote to the department requesting an appeal she was denied and her file was forwarded to the Fraud Unit for investigation. The Ombudsman's investigation established she was unfairly denied the right to appeal her overpayment. The department subsequently agreed to allow her to appeal to the Citizens' Appeal Panel.
  • An inmate was found guilty by a disciplinary panel of creating a disturbance or inciting other inmates to create a disturbance and was sentenced to time in disciplinary segregation. The inmate alleged he was not allowed to present his case because the disciplinary panel would not let an inmate in the cell next to him give evidence.
Full Disclosure

There must be full disclosure of the case against a person. This includes all reports prepared by tribunal or department staff or any other report or information that is in the possession of the decision-maker. The following is an example of non-disclosure:
  • A committee, created in a regulation, sought and obtained an expert medical opinion which it used in making its decision to deny benefits. The committee never provided the medical opinion to the complainant.



Copyright 2010 Alberta Ombudsman. All Rights Reserved.